• RedSnt 👓♂️🧩 🧠 🖥️@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago
    Trying to keep a public torrent alive is hard work, but someone has to do it.

    Back when I had VDSL and even ADSL, I’d try to hit 1.1 ratio because if everyone did that the risk of information being lost would be close to 0%. Nowadays with gigabit internet, all that prevents me from seeding is hard drive space, and 8 TB doesn’t fill up quickly with how few good movies and series there are these days. I guess that’s one way to stop piracy, just make fewer and worse series/movies.

  • Priyathium@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I did that.

    And rightfully so, I was a 15 year old in a third world country with a beat up compaq computer to download movies overnight. I couldn’t seed cuz my father would find out I wasted the internet.

    Today, I can seed and have a 26TB hard drive, I preserve old movies in my native language (Telugu) and seed them.

    Do we need people to learn about seeding and ratios? Definitely. But I believe in

    Today’s leechers are tomorrow’s seeders.

    And don’t blame them.

    • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sounds like you grew up and your hardware did too!

      Not everyone is able to seed unfortunately. Here the downloading aspect although not allowed seeding is when you can receive fines.

      Hence I cross seed everything to I2P.

      Of course only Linux ISOs 😉

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I leech because i have a 1mbps upload speed and if i’m uploading using that then my download speeds tank rendering my connection useless.

      I’m moving in the next year and when i get a place with more than ADSL you bet i’m setting up a seedbox

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Personally I enjoy seeing the numbers go up. Looking at the current top ten by ratio according to my torrent client most of them are obscure things that I’m probably the only one seeding — but the number one spot, at a ratio of 565, goes to “Shrek (2001) [1080p]”.

      • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        My Linux Mint 22 iso currently has a ratio of 11908.34 over the last year and a bit.

        Edit: linuxmint-22.2-cinnamon-64bit.iso is gaining fast with a ratio of 314 in just two weeks.

      • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I was over 900 on several torrents before switching clients about a year ago. I have a few in the 300s now.

  • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    just had a silly idea: stopping your torrent right as it starts to seed (to avoid ISP letters) is like pulling out as a form of birth control

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Has the law in any jurisdiction determined that sharing some small fraction of bits is equivalent to sharing an entire series of bits? And how do they determine that? Like I’m sending 1s and 0s right now. Is that a violation?

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean, at that point everything is legal if we pretend to just send “random” 0s and 1s

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          But there must be some kind of burden of proof, right? If I leech 0.001% of a file, have I really pirated that file? If yes, then how small does the amount go? If no, then how large does it go? Or if they have to prove intent, well then that can go to trial…

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Did a little digging around. It looks like they manage to get discovery judgments all the time over partial downloads, but I don’t see them actually taking anyone to court for anything less than a full file.

        Once you have the entire file available, it’s hard to shimmy around the distribution claims. Wouldn’t it be super effing interesting if everyone’s torrent client specifically picked a random block and refused to give it to anyone?

        I’m not sure it would hold up in court, but it would be interesting.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s… not how it works. A law firm rep (usually) just has to connect to the swarm and see what IPs are there. It matters not if you share, being in the swarm is enough for them to send your ISP a notice of infringement. So as others said, use protection.

  • Johanno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have now a ratio of 9.1 and 250TB of uploaded…

    Also my hard drive is getting full. I guess I have to clean up some torrents soon.

    Or buy new storage

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Buy more storage, but also… join private trackers when they open signups. You’d be amazing there.

        • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          There are some niche private trackers which have an active community that handle quality and requests. Also they don’t let just anyone create a torrent, so you can have assurances that the files have been vetted to some extent and you’re not going to download something unexpected.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The advantage of private trackers is that:

          • torrents almost always have seeds
          • you can ask for re-seeds in case they aren’t
          • torrents have a good quality
          • you’re less likely to receive a complaint letter from copyright holders
      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Public tracker: You are the hero, getting a 30:1 upload ratio in a mere 30 days. “Wow, this shit is easy!”

        Private tracker: “Please… can this torrent even reach 10% upload? It’s been an ENTIRE YEAR! I have 500 torrents in the same state!”

        • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachtsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Most private trackers have some sort of bonus point system now where you earn points per hour of seeding per torrent, regardless of how much data you actually upload. You can then use those points to buy upload credit and raise your ratio

      • Klajan@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Most VPN Providers block Port forwarding, so I’m guessing that would be the cause here.

        • SatyrSack@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That alone does not prevent seeding. One can absolutely seed and leech without port forwarding, they will just have fewer connections than they would with port forwarding set up.

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I used to seed in the old days, but I feel it has become more complicated now.

    The primary issue (before eg.: CGNAT or port-opening issues) is it’s become more and more often the case that I post-process what I download before use (rename / reencode music albums, reencode movies) so it makes little sense to keep the old files only for seeding. In theory a “seedbox” (those are the trendy thing this decade, right?) would help solve this, but I’m still rather new and have not found any FOSS, PII-free offerings in the market.

  • Sickday@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Friendly reminder that seedboxes are definitely worth it. Go for a seedbox if you can afford it

  • yamamoon@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’d be nice if we can have some kind of standard for torrents so we don’t have a bunch of duplicates on our system.

    For something like games, it just doesn’t make sense to have the torrent and the install. It takes up so much space.

    Portable installs are always best.

  • Scrollone@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    People should learn how to seed. If you don’t want to seed, just pay for Usenet.

    • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a shame Usenet has become fully paid. It’s what ultimately pushed me into torrents. And the fact that small communities don’t have all the content out there for you to download via Usenet.

      • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Downloading large files from Usenet was paid pretty early on. If the core functionality of Usenet is now paid, this is news to me.

        • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          There weren open test servers though and sites with limited trials but no data limit.

          That’s what I used back in the day. Sadly all these trial offers are gone now and demand credit card information upfront.

        • Arcka@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          What do you consider large files? Isn’t the article size usually limited to something like 1mb (it’s been a while since I used Usenet)?

          So it would technically be about the number of articles rather than the eventual size of the combined archive? At the core it’s all still text right?

          • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Pirated media(images, movies, ebooks, ROMs) uses binary posts, not text. There are different limits and retention policies for binary versus text articles, and most Usenet servers, particularly cheap or free ones, don’t host a lot of the categories a pirate would want at all.

            Please don’t imply that all Usenet providers facilitate piracy.

            • Arcka@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Thanks for the pointer! I took the opportunity to learn a bit about more recent NNTP by reading the standard: RFC 3977. It looks like nntp v2 circa 2006 added MIME encoding, so I would guess that may be how a service provider would differentiate.

              I haven’t used Usenet since the turn of the century. Back then it was all text (including every article under alt.binaries), and even pirated media needed to be split into a multi-part format (often rar) then each part uuencoded so it could be included in an article.