Skua

Research shows strangulation is never a safe practice, despite a widespread belief it can be performed safely. Though it often leaves no visible injury, oxygen deprivation, even for very short moments, causes changes to the fragile structures of the brain.

Multiple studies have specifically shown brain changes in women who have been repeatedly “choked” during sex, including markers for brain damage and disruptions in brain hemispheres linked to depression and anxiety.

To be honest that actually seems like reason enough even if it is genuinely consensual

Taking bets on whether or not he even realises that it’s already lower for young people, as the article points out

Jesus fucking christ “don’t uncritically promote incredibly obvious Holocaust-denying Nazis to your audience for their analysis of the Talmud” is neither a nitpick nor a bar we should be failing to clear here. She does not need DerWulf’s vicious racism in order to be anti-Zionist.

Do you give this same leeway to racists that do the same thing to Muslims over Muhammad and Aisha? Even when those racists are calling themselves “Der Wulf” and have a crusader as a profile picture?

What she retweeted was a blatantly open Nazi calling Jews paedophiles, and she did so with no criticism whatsoever

Yeah I’m gonna be honest, I think this woman actually does genuinely hate Jews and not just Zionism. Read through the pinned post on her twitter account (heads up for anyone clicking, the third post is photos of a Palestinian’s corpse)

“It is legitimate to identify and condemn jewish extremism and terrorism. World jewry remains largely in support of jewish supremacy (Zionism), terrorism, and extremism”

For a solid example she retweeted this fucking guy just a couple of days ago

It’s a bit of a catch-22 in which good and bad circumstances both make people hesitant to upset the apple cart. Economy is bad? Seems dangerous to put barriers up with our primary trading partners (the rest of the UK). Economy is good? Well then let’s stay and take advantage of it

To be clear I do think it’d work out better in the long run, particularly in terms of democratic representation because FPTP is fucked and not going to go away easily. I get why people are reticent though

No idea what that is. I’m just talking about abortion here tbh.

Maybe read the article before commenting on whether or not it’s a “Farage W” then

Personally I believe that even if we agree that a foetus is a living human right from the moment of conception, no human has the right to force another human to use their own body to sustain them. I can’t demand that you let me connect us together with an IV so I can use your blood even if my life depends on it. Never mind that those “edge cases” are actually extremely important to a lot of people.

Buffer zone laws exist because those protests consistently target people seeking help in vulnerable situation, not the people with any power to actually make the changes that the protestors want. Your right to protest must be balanced against people’s right to access medical care.

None, and I do mean none, of the things you mentioned in the third and fourth paragraphs of your comment were brought about by abortion. Are you seriously trying to suggest that any of those things were better in, say, Victorian era Britain?

If those were the motivations behind abortion it’d be far, far easier for them to promote contraception instead. Why would this sinister lobby bother waiting for conception?

The ADF also has serious problems beyond just the abortion debate, though. Nobody should be associating with a group that has chosen to argue in court that barring people from adopting children on the grounds that they’re Jewish is okay.

No. What the fuck?

Also, any men with a shred of decency in them should know that

Even if we set tactical voting aside, which is not something I would be willing to do lightly, they have displayed far too much incompetence already. They managed to have multiple major public fuckups before they even chose their name

No, that was a data analytics company called Astronomer

It’s still an AI company founded by a bunch of ex OpenAI higher ups with billions in funding from big tech and venture capital. It’s the exact same as the others

They were in the news not long ago for agreeing to pay $1.5 billion to book authors in a class action suit

“Too”? Why would you expect anything else from them?

On the one hand, yes. On the other, Starmer didn’t break it. He inherited it with the damage and has so far failed to fix it

According to BBC News, about 200 of them had already been released on bail by the end of the night (which, for Americans reading, does not involve handing over any money in the UK). I imagine most of the rest will get the same within the next couple of days

He already has been, the amount of money Lockheed Martin has missed out on due to countries turning away from the F-35 is eye-watering

How have they managed to do this kind of fuck up twice before even entering politics properly?

Here was me thinking that Toss Master was the one to go for