To measure them, actually!

could the black box be lifted revealing the contents of what it covered

If we’re talking raster images, then no, you’re not using some mathematical model to morph an image, you’re just overwriting pixels arbitrarily, so there would be no way to recover what’s “under” the box because there’s no second layer.
If instead it’s something like a PDF (vector), then placing an object over another without flattening the result would allow you to move it out of the way to reveal what’s under.

I would add, of course, make sure that the black box covers enough to prevent the possibility of inferring what’s under, so if it’s text or other organic things that can be “statistically” regenerated with some model, don’t leave any borders that can identify the item, reconstructed data may be synthetic, but can provide informed guesses

Same here, Fedora, in particular, once atomic, I’m never looking back on my machines.
Before that I once used Endeavour and can vouch for its reliability

Wow, that’s a very thorough review, nice!
I do hope that these companies start to dig one inch deeper at least before providing grants and stuff, it really is a slap in the face of proper distributions (though I feel like the author’s recommendation of Manjaro is misguided 👀), of course at the end of the day they can give money to whoever the hell they want, but if they want to make good publicity, they’d better make sure they get it right

Interesting! What are its upsides over virt-manager?

Would love to point you in the right direction, but I’ve only briefly skimmed some articles that talk about how the thing I was referring to, i.e. making container images with Nix as the base, can be made.

As for service definitions in Compose, I’m not aware of a way to map that into a Nix native approach. There might be though, I don’t know

This is the elite ball knowledge I need

Container images and NixOS is actually a match made in heaven, so yes it’s NixOS all the way, except I spend 10 times reading scattered documentation and tutorials rather than getting a working configuration… Fedora ain’t so bad

Knome or go home

That’s actually cute, sometimes I wish I were innocent to the abomination of squeal

Guh-asp!

Knice to meat you

secure password share links.

That is one of the things that I really wish were on bitwarden

The project looks a bit sketchy being in big part written by some Manus AI agent, I wouldn’t trust probably lightly reviewed code to take on the task of data erasure on my device.
It’s also unclear from reading the documentation if it treats SSD data erasure correctly as you can’t simply overwrite data a bunch of times anymore on most SSDs.
Of course, both things can be checked from reading the source code, I’m just giving a heads up.
Being written in big part by an LLM the question of copyright is also important, can it really be released under any open license as is?

That aside, you might want to post to !scienza@feddit.it for Italian content.

That can only work if the apps you’re using, as you say, have that export feature and if it is also complete, because oftentimes it doesn’t carry everything over. I had compiled a list of my apps to get all those details written down and many had incomplete exports.

I was asking about the native feature specifically to know from someone else how good it is, since I’ve only had my first Graphene OS device as of now

May I ask how you approached getting your old device’s data onto the new one? Did you use the integrated backup functionality?

I would love to live in a world where banning sharks would make everyone stop buying ice cream

Facts, but lowkey a tagging filesystem instead of a tree one would be amazing, that would be an amorphous blob I’d love to see

/dev/null

I mean, it at least takes out the clients that honour it