![When u make a silly joke on this platform [Smooth Dunk]](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/318abf30-dc00-4b23-a4a4-8cf6a78d1477.png){kind=link}
Smooth Dunk | Bluesky
Transcript
5 panel comic
Panel 1: Pink guy saying: I just made a silly joke!
Panel 2: Pink guy turns to see a door swing open, revealing a Weird Greenish Guy in the doorway
Panels 3-5: Weird greenish guy begins to walk towards Pink Guy in a very creepy manner. He says: I’m Gonna take it SERIOUSLY
By panel 5 Weird Guy has Pink Guy in a death grip. He’s going to throttle him for having the audacity to tell a silly joke on social media
If it’s the same reasons, then they can accomplish the same goals with upvotes.
No they can’t indicate a negative preference through upvotes.
My suggestion was that they continue using downvotes for that, but it would only be seen by moderators. And you can show your negative preferences by upvoting the other comments, and it would still be visible to everyone.
Why would I upvote comments that don’t deserve it just to show one comment has slightly less upvotes? How would I differentiate between one I thought deserved an upvote more than the rest when I’m trying to ‘downvote’ another comment by up voting everything else?
Upvote good, don’t vote if neutral, and downvote if bad makes perfect sense. Your suggestion and alternate approach to voting makes zero sense.
People do it all the time. They downvote one person and upvote everyone else because it doubles the effect of their votes. It’s even already happened in this very comment chain.
I don’t think hyperbole helps here.
I literally mean it makes zero sense.
Nada. Nill.
Not hyperbole.
Oh, sorry. This isn’t the sort of discussion that I choose to participate in. Goodbye.
Oh sorry, didn’t realize that your 6 comments wasn’t participation.
Have you considered down voting to get your point across instead?