Now a days people refer to AI instantly for an answer. Maybe it’s a problem they could have solved within 10min in their head or a question they could have done an internet search on and read a few forums to figure out. However, now people go straight to AI which is known to give many many wrong answers.

I know a couple people that fit this bill and now I almost completely disregard what they say. We’ll even be talking face to face and they’ll ask AI something from our conversation in real time.

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    The article in your library/wikipedia/forum takes 10 contributors and publishes a single, public article for which all can see it. Chatbots take 10 contributions and summarizes them into a single, private article that undergoes no review whatsoever. If you don’t already know the answer, you have no inclination as to what’s true. It’s nowhere near the same.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      Nope, statistically information was just unreliable. And before internet is even worse. Doomers just don’t want to believe we’re actually not regressing but I get it - the real answer is just too boring.