• UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    And you believe that this supports your statement that there are

    “l thousands of people who are sex offenders for merely urinating in public”

    ?

    • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes. If there’s 850,000 on the sex offender registry, a 1% “false positive” rate is almost certainly undercounting it, especially with the way our criminal justice system works. Do the vast majority 95%+ belong there, yes I believe that. But even a 1% rate leads to thousands of people being on the list unnecessarily.

          • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Strange, I thought we were talking about registered sex offenders. Did you forget or just realize that you pulled that number directly from your ass?

            If you want to make rules for this discussion, how about we start with you agreeing to stop making shit up?

            • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yes, registered sex offenders are a subset of the people convicted of crimes. What’s strange about that?

              And what did I make up? I gave you sources for everything I claimed to you. Do you have anything to back up your claims here?

              • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                You claim there are THOUSANDS of not-really-sex offenders that are registered sex offenders. Why you are so interested in propagating that myth, I can only guess, but you have not actually provided a single source that actually says that.

                • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  And you claim there aren’t, but i showed you some sources to back up my logic, and you haven’t shown me anything so what am I supposed to take away from your replies?

                  • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    Ok. How about this. Since its really hard to prove a negative, how about we lower the bar for you to make this REALLY easy. Post 5 cases of a person whose ONLY offense was public urination that resulted in them being put on the sex offender registry. That is it. I don’t need you to prove that there are THOUSANDS. Just give me FIVE. that should be easy since there ARE thousands of registered sex offenders out there and if this happens THOUSANDS of times then it should be real easy to tease out a couple real world examples. Go for it.

                    That is it. Show me just FIVE cases out of the literally millions of people that have been put on the sex offender registry and I will concede that it could indeed be THOUSANDS.

                    If you cannot find even FIVE people this has actually happened to, then you have to concede that it is a made up bullshit argument.

                    How about that?