• 11 Posts
  • 35 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 13th, 2023

help-circle




  • The sims don’t really build anything on their own. I play the Sims 2, because it’s got decades of mods available at this point. The newer games don’t really seem worth it - the Sims 4 is very much focused on parcelling our everything as DLC.

    Basically, I have a bunch of STALKER and Fallout 3 assets ported into the game and use them to decorate my little post apocalyptic setting. I try to destroy/rebuild in a way that looks sorta organic - having them squat in abandoned bowling alleys and the like.

    Imho the Sims 2 is worth getting into. We’ve reached the point in the nostalgia cycle where the ridiculous early 00’s clothing is endearing. It’s a really open ended story telling tool, and with modding you can do things like historical simulations or weird sim cults or prisons… but even just playing the vanilla game has a lot of charm of its own.







  • “Just walking, Mr. Mead?”

    “Yes.”

    “But you haven’t explained for what purpose.”

    “I explained; for air, and to see, and just to walk.”

    “Have you done this often?”

    “Every night for years.”

    The police car sat in the center of the street with its radio throat faintly humming.

    “Well, Mr. Mead,” it said.

    “Is that all?” he asked politely.

    “Yes,” said the voice. “Here.” There was a sigh, a pop. The back door of the police car sprang wide. "Get in.”

    “Wait a minute, I haven’t done anything!”

    “Get in.”

    “The Pedestrian” - Ray Bradbury




  • Look up when Tacitus was writing his histories versus when they happened. Most ancient history is written years after the fact.

    They also give us historical information about the time they were written, even if we can’t trust their accounts of the time they claim to describe.

    Also, most books in the New Testament were written within a matter of decades.

    Y’all really need to take some history classes. We don’t treat sources as if they are infallible depictions of events. We think about bias. We think about corroborating evidence. And if there are problems in a source, that doesn’t mean it has no value.



  • Yeah, how silly to critically analyze ancient historical/cultural texts to better understand history. Obvious the study of history is just about judging how stupid people in the past were compared to us modern day geniuses. That’s the real value of reading history - the schadenfreude of “lol those stupid ancient Greeks didn’t understand how thunder works. I’m so much smarter than they were.”

    It’s not like there’s any value in trying to watch the evolution of a cultures belief over time, and try to see if you can better understand patterns and trends in human behavior. The Bible is poopoo for dumdums, and there’s no value in anything that isn’t STEM.







  • The Handmaid’s Tale (it’s kinda funny how both you and a commenter replying to you misspell the name in two different ways) is going for a “The Lady or the Tiger” ending. Do you believe that Nick is actually part of the Resistance, or is he part of the state secret police? The narrative tricked us a little with the “relationship” between Offred and the Commander - can we trust anyone at all?

    The epilogue also gives the narrative some verisimilitude. It’s pretending to be a historical document - how would the world post-Gilead react to accounts of what happened to women during Gilead? How would you interact with the Diary of Anne Frank if you didn’t know that she was killed in the camps?

    I fail to see how it’s similar to “The Mist” here.