It’s awful. We should absolutely defend ourselves but not go around indiscriminately beating up on people.

I mean, you’re not wrong lol! But at least it is supposed to go through a proper procedure with the state.

Oh? That’s awful! Totally agree that this should either default to invisible or make it easier for you to block.

If you read the article, it gets into it a little bit. Demolishing the homes, building smaller homes, and primarily creating some kind of enormous underground bunker-type network.

You could make some money doing Star Wars events and conventions and such.

The “you cannot kill yourself” part is enforcing you have to pick one or the other. No picking neither.

Crazy to see this accurate comment downvoted even though it explains it perfectly. That’s the difference. Liberals are race reductionist right wing capitalists who are occasionally sympathetic to limited social democracy.

How long until you last saw him?

Although I would say that the inability to contact moderators and have a formal process of requests is significantly worse. I agree about the material sense of transparency.

Back in the late 90s when people started saying that to me, I’d just say ok, get naked RIGHT NOW. What, now you’ve got something to hide?

A few people took me seriously from that but it usually just fell short.

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/dns/

From the mega thread here

Omg if my girlfriend had $10k to give me for a server I could buy like a RAM or two!

That’s why I’m objecting. Being fat isn’t a problem; it’s everything that can go along with it, like diabetes and so on. But being rich IS a problem. It’s kind of like saying “financial whiteness”.

No capitalist can. It’s definitional to the system.

Financial obesity makes it seem like it’s the same as being fat, which doesn’t make sense because being fat is not a specific problem in the same way that being rich is.

I’m sure you just mean it like “fat cat” but it’s a bizarre way to phrase it since it isn’t a good analogy.