

I would argue it is an important distinction, though.
The original statement implies that there is a problem in how California classifies what constitutes a risk.
That comment claims that it’s manufacturers being lazy.
If it’s manufacturers being lazy, then the issue is the regulation is too relaxed, allowing them to just bypass the regulation by slapping pointless stickers on things (like websites try to do with cookie banners)
If the actual requirements to not need the sticker are so stringent that everything with the label actually does need it, then there’s a problem with the level of danger listed and the regulation is too onerous.



A bigger issue than the APK changes is that Google no longer releases the source for Pixels after the 9.
Graphene claims they are partnering with another OEM, but we’ll see how it goes
https://www.androidauthority.com/graphene-os-major-android-oem-partnership-3606853/