Huh, I knew the plants used for enrichment were called centrifuges but for some reason I always assumed they were not literal centrifuges. Neat.

deleted by creator

The american obsession with using euphemism to mask fucked-up shit

Marxism-Leninism

Accurate on many levels

I wish I could both upvote and downvote at the same time

The connection is that while the “system drive” (C:\ in Windows, / in Linux) for each system has its own partition, the EFI partition is shared. This is the partition where the files needed to load the respective OSes live, aka the entries you see in the bootloader. You could create a new EFI partition and tell Linux to use that one, but then you would have to select the OS from the boot devices in the BIOS, so no one does that.

Also is the fix to manually increase the size of that partition?

Well, yes, but the problem is that it’s at the start of the drive, usually. That means you can not expand it without moving the main Windows partition, which is a pretty bad idea (terrible on HDDs) as it’s prone to data loss. If your OEM put it at the end then you’re very lucky and it’s a quick operation, although it might require to delete some OEM-specific partition (which only serves to give you the branded wallpapers and bloatware if you factory reset from within Windows)

Honestly, if you don’t distrohop this shouldn’t be a problem. I had to do a stupid installation dance to have a 500MiB EFI partition, but I was motivated to do it because:

1. I hate Microsoft
2. I wanted to fuck around with kernels, bootloaders, and distros

That’s an if statement, not an authority.

No one mentioned this yet, but a possible issue is that Windows, for some damn reason, still creates a 100MiB EFI partition, although by EFI spec It should be at least 256 iirc

This can cause the /boot/EFI partition to fill up. Some distros/bootloader are more affected than others, but I’ve had it happen a couple of times

So you’re suggesting running a kneecapped system over USB rather than reinstalling grub twice a year?

Yeah, I guess we disagree on what that means. From my understanding, the fact that such an authority can not exist means to you that the system will be corrupt or unfair, because someone ultimately needs to decide whether you qualify or not. I disagree with that and think you can just skip the authority altogether. Just verify they are not employed and have sold some threshold amount of art, or made performances, over 6 months or something

So you are saying that no single authority can define who is or isn’t an artist because art is personal? I agree.

Here it is guys, found who’s the authority on what is art and what is slop

No, it would lead to loads of self-proclaimed artists. Successful and real are not the same thing

What? How is it random? Having sold your art makes you a professional artist, by definition. Then they sampled at random because it’s a pilot program

You yourself?

Are you using most of your day being creative, or do you have steady employment? You don’t need an authority to determine who is an artist

0.00004% (billionaires over world population), but yeah. Somebody please tell me why we’re using technology to “make money” instead of progressing the human living standard

Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act doesn’t hit the same, especially after knowing what they would pass for “terrorism”

New captcha just dropped

A legitimate backdoor is still a backdoor. If you have security measures and a way to bypass them, you don’t have security measures.