I never called it reasonable. I just don’t think it’s especially egregious. Honestly, I would price the value of Valve’s contribution (which is definitely not zero) at maybe 15% to 20%, but that’s just a gut feeling.
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
I’m not saying the standard doesn’t suck, just taking issue with the implication that anyone using it is uniquely bad to do so.
But yeah, you’re right that getting me to admit Steam (overall) sucks would be nigh impossible. I genuinely don’t believe it does, so there’s nothing to admit. Maybe you could convince me to lie about it though? Lol.
I do admit there’s a few places it sucks, the gambling stuff being the biggest, but their positives eclipse those for me. I also acknowledge I’m in a privileged position being able to enjoy Valve’s efforts in VR, Linux compatibility, etc. directly and that I might have different opinions if I was on the outside looking in. I imagine that’s not quite the admission you want though.
30% is the industry standard though, and Valve’s contributions of distribution and discovery infrastructure, its audience, and expanding hardware initiatives are not nothing. If you’re not pricing a game to give yourself a healthy margin within the 70% or your development model doesn’t make that viable, that’s really on you.
ericwdhs@discuss.onlineto
DeGoogle Yourself@lemmy.ml•Be aware that ALL samsung phones can't be degoogled anymore. Do not ever buy samsung again if you hope to make calls.
2·28 days agoIt was mentioned. I remember a “Patriot or Traitor?” headline, so the news was at least charitable enough to throw the first option in. Honestly, it’s probably more that I just wasn’t following the news as much then.
ericwdhs@discuss.onlineto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Glorious cracked out wall kitten returns with more wisdom for the masses.
4·28 days agoAs someone who always backs in (unless it’s a diagonal or pull-through spot) and a math person, I’m ashamed to say I never thought of the geometry of it, so thanks for the additional reason to add to my arsenal.
I can add it to “ready to leave quickly in an emergency,” “practicing delayed gratification,” “backup camera guidelines make centering easier,” “constant trunk access,” and the biggest real reason, “I have a bad habit of leaving for obligations at the last possible minute and need to plan ahead.”
ericwdhs@discuss.onlineto
DeGoogle Yourself@lemmy.ml•Be aware that ALL samsung phones can't be degoogled anymore. Do not ever buy samsung again if you hope to make calls.
3·29 days agoThanks! I assume you’re in Australia from your instance. I’m in the US. On top of using American companies just being a given here, let’s just say the coverage of Snowden in 2013 was inadequate in my circles at the time.
ericwdhs@discuss.onlineto
DeGoogle Yourself@lemmy.ml•Be aware that ALL samsung phones can't be degoogled anymore. Do not ever buy samsung again if you hope to make calls.
4·30 days agoFunnily enough, I’ve thought of the cloud as “someone else’s computer” from the beginning and shun using it more than everyone else I know, but I was just getting into the space when Gmail and Chrome were the hot new things, each gradual step into the ecosystem didn’t feel like a big concession, and I was too young to know to question the convenience.
In case it wasn’t clear, reversing those two decades of inertia and tech debt is what I was referring to as the time-consuming bit. So far, what I’ve finished switching over is actually quite nice to use.
And yes, I dread the day even the fallback options start getting killed off. It’s always one bad law away.
ericwdhs@discuss.onlineto
DeGoogle Yourself@lemmy.ml•Be aware that ALL samsung phones can't be degoogled anymore. Do not ever buy samsung again if you hope to make calls.
15·1 month agoYeah, technology enshittification as a whole has definitely picked up the last few years, and I find myself compromising more and more as the field of reasonable options gets narrower.
Like you, I used to only go for phones with SD card and headphone jack support. Now, I’m on a (new but not bought from Google) Pixel 9 Fold with GrapheneOS using a DAC adapter to still have wired audio and a more deliberate storage management system to compensate for not having SD cards. (Unlike you, I need a big screen for spreadsheets and such.)
I purposely bought the newest phone I could within my budget, because I’m planning for Android to be completely unviable the next time I need to upgrade, and I want to give Linux phones as much time to mature as possible before I inevitably migrate.
It seems offline tech is going to be the last bastion of safety sooner rather than later, so I’m in various stages of migrating my digital life offline. Linux over Windows. Keepass, LibreOffice, Obsidian, etc. + Syncthing over cloud options. Keeping off-site backups with friends and family instead of in the cloud. Keeping local DRM-free media. It’s time-consuming but rewarding. I should have done it all way sooner.
Yeah, the price parity thing seems to be a big misconception here especially. The price parity guideline comes from Valve’s page for Steam keys. Valve gets a 0% cut when keys are sold on third-party sites, yet they still use Valve’s infrastructure, so it makes sense for Valve to not want you to price them to have all your key sales go third-party.
As far as I can tell, Valve has zero interest in how you sell copies of a game that don’t use Steam keys.
Also something I noticed per their guidelines:
As a frequent user of IsThereAnyDeal, I can tell you it’s more common than not for a game’s historical low price to not be on Steam, so Valve is definitely not strictly enforcing this. With this and the lack of legalese on the page and letting developers/publishers determine what “similar” and “comparable” are on their own terms, I’m not seeing anything Valve should be doing differently here.