shoe’s on the other foot now, I guess

For years, scientists have long wondered, can you make grown men and women weep tears of joy by playing Tom Jones’ “It’s Not Unusual”, and the answer is yes, you can, so long as it is preceded by seven “What’s New Pussycat”'s.

I’m not sure whether I’m more impressed or disturbed by the amount of thought you’ve given this

Must your climax be fueled by our frustrations?

Maybe that’s exactly what gets him off.

Just the screen? I’d have that entire thing in pieces before I left.

but I know that there is at least one where the odds of a letter to Nature being accurate a few years later is about 50%.

…

you know, there is a difference between “getting published in Nature” and “submitting your work to Nature”. It’s subtle, perhaps: one involves being published in the journal. For the world to see and scrutinize.

I bet they get lots of letters that they do, indeed, find aren’t well substantiated enough to publish.

Also, one field. Lmao.

Also, please tell me why you made your first comment, I’m genuinely curious. Did you read about this somewhere? Where, if you recall?