

71·
6 days agoDoesn’t need to be confiscated. Just stop sales and the number goes down over time.
And before you start, you don’t have to stop all sales. We can start with the ones that have potential to kill the most.


Doesn’t need to be confiscated. Just stop sales and the number goes down over time.
And before you start, you don’t have to stop all sales. We can start with the ones that have potential to kill the most.
There is a lot of piracy for consoles. It’s just a matter of time.


It seems like a pretty fair deal for peace. US ceases aggression and helps rebuild. Iran reopens the strait.
Everything else is window dressing. Promises can always be broken by either side, but this would conclusively end things for now.
Is it great solely for US self interest? Maybe not but no one cares.
We are in agreement. If someone wants to buy a firearm in the US there are many ways they can do so to skirt government oversight.
But it would still good true that if you ban the sale of certain firearms, the number of people that own said type of firearm will go down over time. Simply introducing a barrier of entry is enough to deter at least some people from buying that specific firearm.
That to me is fine. I don’t think we should overspend our resources trying to do this. Just start with the low hanging fruit with the highest roi.