By all means, attack what Brooks said. Engage his argument!

The article linked does not engage his argument. Appearing at one event with Epstein 14 years ago is simply not newsworthy.

What is the evidence for that assertion?

Anyone who thinks this is a non-story is either a pedophile themselves or intentjonallh covering for child trafficing pediphiles

Epstein isn’t even in the photos with Brooks. Which pedophile am I covering up for, exactly?

We don’t know if David Brooks is a pedophile

That’s entirely the point.

I have my issues with Brooks’ article, but come on. Appearing in the same place/event as Jeffrey Epstein, by itself, means nothing.

They have multiple photographs of Brooks at the event and Epstein isn’t in a single one. This is a nothingburger.

Yeah this isn’t really headline news, unfortunately.