Interesting! I can’t imagine Amazon would want to argue #2, though, since it seems like that would completely undercut their ability to use AI agents in this way.

I hadn’t really thought about the implications of the ability of an AI agent to contract, though. That seems like really murky (and intriguing) territory; whether they can or cant, either way would have a lot of interesting implications.

It’s not like every lawyer in the world is quaking in their boots at the mere thought of going up against Amazon.

Could he not put terms of use on his website prohibiting the use by AI agents, and sue Amazon if they don’t comply?

Every janitor and secretary? Every investor? anyone who worked at any of the banks he used?

Yeah, that’s obviously what I mean.

The Clintons have been under the microscope for decades.

“Oh, those poor rich and powerful people! Surely we can look the other way about just a little bit of palling around with a pedophile!”

This is just a distraction

Yes, that was one of the hands. Well spotted.

On the one hand, Cormer is a shill and is clearly trying to divert attention away from Trump and toward the Clintons. On the other hand, anyone associated with Epistein should have to face the music.

I don’t have much hope that they will get the justice they deserve.

Blowing up the boat in the first place.