

The article is essentially a text version of that video.


The article is essentially a text version of that video.


Huh, this borders on plagiarism.
This article is essentially a transcription of this video https://youtu.be/WnzR5aOElvw
I agree with the sentiment, I just found it to be a funny context to bring it up in ;)
your talk about art sparking the imagination tells me you don’t see two legs and a jar in the tv shadow.
…or maybe you do, who am i to judge.


well, “scammers in iran” doing it, and “iran” doing it, is two very different statements.
You need to be more careful with context.
That’s Richard Ayoade in the picture, and he’s a fuckin’ national treasure.


Insurance companies too exist to make money. If their customers generally went plus, the insurance company would go out of business.


nice job blindly taking the comment at face value while completely ignoring the context.


that seems, inefficient
… except in 100, when it doesn’t, except again in 400, then it does.
This is not applicable to arch tho
Each package is updated independently, you pull updates whenever you feel like it, be that monthly or every five minutes


You are wrong on that last part
In accordance with Nobel’s will, the prize is selected by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, a five-member committee appointed by the Parliament of Norway unlike all the other awards chosen by the Swedish Nobel Committee.


no, but misuse, yes.


[I was probably wrong, disregard]


Wouldn’t that be somewhere along the lines of $1000 per person, if divided over every single person in the world?


Well, more along the lines of 10% of all the worlds money.
… very reasonable indeed 😜
Thats why I’m saying borders on. I know it’s not technically plagiarizing, but they really did just lift the video into text form and call it their own article.
Yes they credit her, but what did they actually add themselves?