Curious they’re suing the NYTimes instead of the various interviewees.

Beating down on kids is so human.

I understand the article topic is enforced sanctions on third parties. That however was not quite what I was getting at, as my question was about two parties, a buyer and a seller. An atheist entity and a religious entity. Also, I note you didn’t answer my question about the source of your atheism quote.

Atheism is when you accept collective punishment of religious people

What is the source of your quote? Refusing to buy something from a seller is punishment of the seller?

It’s mildly fascinating that an officially atheist country is willing to make big purchases from a theocracy.

“Drain the Swamp”, “Anti-elite”, “America First”, “Fighting for Main Street, not Wall Street”.

No more Freedom of Navigation? Some other countries might object to that. I hope all you MAGA folks are happy with yourselves.

JH Kellogg was a physician, so his view came with that stamp of medical authority.

That probably goes back to JH Kellogg and his Seventh Day Adventist religion, and possibly back to the Puritans.

Laws are for little people.

Does Wilhoit’s law apply to Islamic Theocracy?

Frank Wilhoit said, "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.