2·
22 days agoRemoved: I don’t see how this is supposed to be uplifting
Mainly on @Aatube@kbin.melroy.org . This account to moderate subs while providing actual reasons for deletion! A feature mbin appears to lack?
- 2 Posts
- 9 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
Cake day: May 23rd, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Your submission in “US news outlets refuse to sign new Pentagon rules to report only official information” was removed as schadenfreude or toxic politics .
It is not.
Your submission in “Still No Kings: Millions to Protest Trump On Saturday” was removed as toxic politics (rule b).
Your submission in “DHS agents retreat as Chicago cops refuse to shield them from swarming protesters” was removed as schadenfreude.
I am once once again asking for your bars—what should be the bar/criteria for removal?
I think we should ask for and respect the decision of the community instead of imposing our own judgements. And of course, we still remove personal attacks (not that your admittedly negative-ish comment counted as one /gen).
What would be your criteria for removing a post as “orphan crushing machine”? (Also, political posts meeting the “More clarification” paragraph at https://lemmy.world/post/30918729 are already removed, the most recent but weak example being the post on Sanders having his tour go to NYC for a Mamdani town hall.) (Separate threads, separate comments.)
What would be your criteria for removing a comment?
I think the uplifting part of this is supposed to be that more people are going for more non-perishable foods that’d last longer and give families more means to survive than measly plastic-wrapped bars. It’s… a stretch, but I don’t think we should remove it. Feel free to downvote the post if you don’t think it’s a good fit for our commag.