• krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The same thing it always does. In the best case, exactly what a program written by a human developer could do but with a high chance of hallucinations and an insane power draw nowhere near worth applying to the trivial problem at hand.

      • kurwa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah that’s what I was thinking. I always see people using AI in place of much more simple solutions and it makes me wince every time

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Any that’s capable of responding to the prompt “predict that the rapture will happen on <tomorrow’s date>.”

      • kurwa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You could just reuse the same canned response and put tomorrow’s date in there. It’s not like these rapture predictions are new / interesting anyway

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          god requires the entity proclaiming the prediction to be capable of fucking up and saying something else, we need to task some theological researchers with figuring out precisely how capable of mistakes it must be