In absolute numbers probably but due to size and population China tops most lists of absolute numbers so it’s not really an informative metric. In terms of per capita I’m 90% sure the US leads China in CCTV cameras.
No China just laps entirely. To have such a large population and also dominate the statistic of cameras per 1000 citizens mean they have millions of more cameras.
I literally quoted the link? Did you read it or just skip to the city comparison? Illiterate much?
“absolutely humiliating and embarrassing for you. Lmfao”
People are going to react to this with a knee-jerk “nuh uh!” because you’re being a smug reddituer about it, but I’m going to take a different approach. China actually invests in its infrastructure so obviously it’s going to have more and newer cameras, simply because it’s actually building and expanding. In China you might be surveilled in one of the more than 1000 high speed rail stations. In the UK it might be in one of four, or more likely a low speed train station. In the US it might be a bus station.
That’s the difference. When countries are growing and building, they’re installing cameras. Every country is going to install more and more cameras forever, the only countries that won’t are the ones that are in decline. China is growing and building faster than anyone, so they’re going to have more cameras. This needs to be taken into account.
Uhhhh pretty sure China holds that title by a long shot my dude
In absolute numbers probably but due to size and population China tops most lists of absolute numbers so it’s not really an informative metric. In terms of per capita I’m 90% sure the US leads China in CCTV cameras.
No China just laps entirely. To have such a large population and also dominate the statistic of cameras per 1000 citizens mean they have millions of more cameras.
Have proof for that because I have articles that state the US is ahead per capita and you seem to just be saying things?
However, if you count the number of cameras per capita, the USA leads the race with the highest number of CCTV cameras per person.
"Let’s first look at the top 10 cities with the most CCTV cameras per 1000 inhabitants:
Taiyuan, China – 119.6
Wuxi – China – 92.1
London, United Kingdom – 67.5
Changsha, China – 56.8
Beijing, China – 56.2
Hangzhou, China – 52.3
Kunming, China – 45.0
Qingdao, China – 44.5
Xiamen, China – 40.3
Harbin, China – 39.1
Now, let’s look at the top 10 cities by CCTV density per square km:
Chennai, India – 657
Hyderabad, India – 480
Harbin, China – 411
London, United Kingdom – 399
Xiamen, China – 385
Chengdu, China – 350
Taiyuan, China – 319
Delhi, India – 289
Kunming, China – 281
Beijing, China – 278"
Didn’t even read your own link. Doesn’t even mention the US, this is about the UK.
I’m done with you liars absolutely humiliating and embarrassing for you. Lmfao
I literally quoted the link? Did you read it or just skip to the city comparison? Illiterate much? “absolutely humiliating and embarrassing for you. Lmfao”
People are going to react to this with a knee-jerk “nuh uh!” because you’re being a smug reddituer about it, but I’m going to take a different approach. China actually invests in its infrastructure so obviously it’s going to have more and newer cameras, simply because it’s actually building and expanding. In China you might be surveilled in one of the more than 1000 high speed rail stations. In the UK it might be in one of four, or more likely a low speed train station. In the US it might be a bus station.
That’s the difference. When countries are growing and building, they’re installing cameras. Every country is going to install more and more cameras forever, the only countries that won’t are the ones that are in decline. China is growing and building faster than anyone, so they’re going to have more cameras. This needs to be taken into account.
No they’re lying. There’s a difference.
I tried.
Go back to Reddit.
Go play with your little lying friends lol