when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 3 months ago[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?message-squaremessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1message-square[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 3 months agomessage-square7linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDingaling@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months ago In the Bible they had to make a law against it So they did about eating Pork, but Christians like the taste so eat it anyway. “Leviticus 11:7-8 that pigs are considered unclean and should not be eaten.”
minus-squareNutomic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoThat sentence is from the old covenant, which also requires animal sacrifice among other things. The entire old covenant is not binding for Christians anymore, since Jesus replaced it with the new covenant.
So they did about eating Pork, but Christians like the taste so eat it anyway.
“Leviticus 11:7-8 that pigs are considered unclean and should not be eaten.”
That sentence is from the old covenant, which also requires animal sacrifice among other things. The entire old covenant is not binding for Christians anymore, since Jesus replaced it with the new covenant.