The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoHe's an arboristlemmy.worldimagemessage-square125linkfedilinkarrow-up1635arrow-down15
arrow-up1630arrow-down1imageHe's an arboristlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square125linkfedilink
minus-squareundefinedValue@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·2 days agoThat’s not how it works with soft bodies though, method B represents potential useable length when pointing down. It’s only distorted because it’s pointing up. For rigid bodies, I’d agree.
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoNobody cares how long the limp branches are.
minus-squareundefinedValue@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoNobodies talking about the limp branches, soft and rigid bodies are a physics term and they don’t mean what you think they do.
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoIt was a boner joke, I could not care less about what these words actually mean.
That’s not how it works with soft bodies though, method B represents potential useable length when pointing down. It’s only distorted because it’s pointing up. For rigid bodies, I’d agree.
Nobody cares how long the limp branches are.
Nobodies talking about the limp branches, soft and rigid bodies are a physics term and they don’t mean what you think they do.
It was a boner joke, I could not care less about what these words actually mean.
So… Non rigid?