• Mossy Feathers (She/Her)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s only a matter of time before they come for furry stuff. They did it with fansly. It’s apparently “simulated bestiality” and from what I’ve heard you aren’t even allowed to reference trans puppy girls, pup play, etc without getting banned.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You don’t have to like it, I’m certainly not into it. Still failing to see how it not being for you justifies puritanical bans

        • teslasaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s not puritanical when the subject hints at beastialty. If you want to fuck animals, seek help.

          • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Does a diaper wearing fetish predispose someone to pedophilia? This reeks of slippery slope fallacy

              • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Some, maybe. Regardless, if two consenting adults want to pretend to be animals or even pretend to be kids while they hump I really don’t see a problem.

                • teslasaur@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  That’s the fucking thing. It’s played up to the point that kids might find it and like it.

                  It wouldn’t be a problem if they didn’t fucking have conventions celebrating it. With kids.

                  Or, you know. On FUCKING STEAM.