violet08@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 days agoIBM 1979 variantlemmy.todayimagemessage-square57linkfedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageIBM 1979 variantlemmy.todayviolet08@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 days agomessage-square57linkfedilink
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·9 days agoHow would that even work? If a robot is sexually attracted to a human it’s more of a zoophilia, right?
minus-squarereal_squids@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·9 days agoJust build a robot that understands consent, easy
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·9 days agoUnfortunately, that may be more difficult than it sounds, because many meatbags struggle with the concept even today.
minus-squarereal_squids@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·9 days agoWell if a robot is just a computer it’s gonna do exactly what it was programmed to, I bet safewords are a lot easier than with meatbags
minus-squareyogurtwrong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoclank clank clank clank SAFE WORD! SAFE WORD! Cannot connect to the speech-to-text API endpoint. Please try again later clank clank clank clank
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoCopilot certainly isn’t getting it.
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up13·9 days ago“Robosexuality”, according to Futurama.
minus-squareMoffKalast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·9 days ago“The good book 3.0 saith, ‘Thou shall not lie down with a human! Nor do it standing up, nor at any angle in between!’” - Preacherbot
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5·9 days agoOne-zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero-zero-zero-one-zero-one-one-one-one-zero-one-zero-zero-zero–zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero
minus-squarenymnympseudonym@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 days agoJFC watch your language there are kids on here
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 days ago Ones and zeroes everywhere! And I thought I saw a two! It was just a dream, Bender. There’s no such thing as two.
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoThat’s the other way around human -> robot
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 days ago“Anthroposexuality” might be the term,. you’re looking for. (Might spoil the original pun but opens a lot of really weird questions.)
How would that even work? If a robot is sexually attracted to a human it’s more of a zoophilia, right?
Just build a robot that understands consent, easy
Unfortunately, that may be more difficult than it sounds, because many meatbags struggle with the concept even today.
Well if a robot is just a computer it’s gonna do exactly what it was programmed to, I bet safewords are a lot easier than with meatbags
clank clank clank clank
SAFE WORD! SAFE WORD!
Cannot connect to the speech-to-text API endpoint. Please try again later
clank clank clank clank
Copilot certainly isn’t getting it.
“Robosexuality”, according to Futurama.
“The good book 3.0 saith, ‘Thou shall not lie down with a human! Nor do it standing up, nor at any angle in between!’” - Preacherbot
One-zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero-zero-zero-one-zero-one-one-one-one-zero-one-zero-zero-zero–zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero
JFC watch your language there are kids on here
That’s the other way around human -> robot
Homosexuality then!
Wait.
“Anthroposexuality” might be the term,. you’re looking for.
(Might spoil the original pun but opens a lot of really weird questions.)