• MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s almost worth comparing, if the resources and human effort needed to maintain a golf course, plus any other positive or negative environmental impacts, are favorable to the effects of a parking lot or whatever. But I imagine that, either way, a proper public park would be way better.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I mean it’s like anything, you can argue either way. Depending on how the grounds are kept it could be a net positive or a negative. But a lot of golf courses are massive polluter because they use resource-intensive grasses and lots of fertilizers and water to keep it alive. There are more eco-friendly ways to manage a golf course but those are not popular because they cost more and golfers don’t like scrub grasses