cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of ‘non-google’ approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

Edit: had to change the title, originally it said Uber too but I cannot find back to the source of ether that’s true or not…

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This makes me want to use GrapheneOS more. If the dataminers don’t want you to use it then it must be doing something right.

      • Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s only officially supported on google phones because sadly those are the only ones that are not modified to fuck which makes installing and supporting other OS’es way too much work.

        Giving google money once for a device is not a problem from a privacy or security standpoint.

        • Samsy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s correct, but not the reason grapheneOS chooses only pixel phones. It’s the level of hardware security features.

          • Telex@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also unlockable and presumably has well working builds. It’s not just graphene, but just about every Android project it there that’s best supported on pixels. Other manufacturers have a crazy variety of locking schemes and required tools. Each one is a nightmare to support.

            • orange@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              For GrapheneOS, it’s primarily that it’s re-lockable. That’s why other unlockable phones aren’t supported.

              The GrapheneOS install process sets new OS signing keys so you can lock the phone again and get full verified boot. However, most manufacturers haven’t implemented this feature.

              • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                What do you get, app/feature wise for verified boot vs. Play integrity app? Does it increase the amount of apps that work on it?

                • orange@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, Play Integrity intentionally checks if it’s a Google-approved key. Android itself has an API to check verified boot and gives info on the signing key - most devs just want to know verified boot is working.

                  I feel Play Integrity has a short life ahead of if competition authorities realise how exactly it works. “Anti-competitive” is the first thing policy-minded folks think when I explain the API to them.

          • ryannathans@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Someone installing graphene os for security shouldn’t be trusting random second/third/etc hand hardware lol

              • Telex@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hypothetically the hardware could have been modified, but that would take some insane level of a determined attacker to be fabricating modified pixels just to sell them on the used market.

                • Anivia@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, this would only be a concern for targeted attacks by state actors, in which case not even buying new would be safe.

                  Thinking about it, in such a scenario buying used may even be safer

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On the other hand, it makes it easy to find which apps aren’t to be trusted with your data.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also very obvious when an app or website have an US and an EU version. You just know they buttfuck the Americans because no rules.

        Even Apple had to make two versions of iOS.

  • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe it’s worth keeping a budget mobile phone at home with Rustdesk host running on it? When you have a need for an app that must run on a genuine Android, you just remote into that phone. Since the phone never leaves home, there’s less to track.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    OK McDonald’s, I will not use your most cost effective ordering method. I guess I will just have to order my 10 individually custom cheeseburgers at the counter instead. I might have to have e the order read back, and change my mind about a few burgers.

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck both of these companies. Never used McDicks app in the first place. Spyware bullshit.

  • zako@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    the problem here is not the banks or apps, the problem is Google Play Integrity API, which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones and it is used to ban secured ROMs such as GrapheneOS and it allows to run apps on outdated phones without security patches.

  • AnEilifintChorcra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol I spent a week going back and forth with Revolut support in august. I could sign into the app but it would always ask me for a “selfie” verification and every time support would say its a super dark selfie.

    Eventually I decided to try a stock ROM and it just worked and I realised what was happening so I transferred all of my money out and deleted my account.

    Most local banks here are terrible at making apps, some even require a separate device that looks like a calculator to use online banking, so hopefully they wont follow suit anytime soon

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s pretty typical when its a low level machine learning algorithm that flagged the account. Usually the support rep legitimately doesn’t know, and you’ll get stuck in an infinite loop

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      require a separate device that looks like a calculator to use online banking

      To be fair this actually provides a very high level of security? At least in my experience with AIB (in Ireland) you needed to enter the amount of the transactions and some other core details (maybe part of the recipient’s account number? can’t quite recall). Then you entered your PIN. This signed the transaction which provides very strong verification that you (via the PIN) authorize the specific transaction via a trusted device that is very unlikely to be compromised (unless you give someone physical access to it).

      It is obviously quite inconvenient. But provides a huge level of security. Unlike this Safety Net crap which is currently quite easy to bypass.

  • Anivia@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Time to switch away from Auth I guess. Not even using GrapheneOS cause I have a Samsung phone, but this is not acceptable

  • I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the shittiest companies are those, who enforce Google’s broken and monopolistic “Play Integrity” API. Revolut has connections to Russia, McDonalds supports the Israeli genocide in Palestine and Authy has always just been a massive piece of shit, not even allowing users to export their TOTP seeds. These are three companies I would NEVER even consider using anyway.

    And “Play Integrity” API actually does NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING for your security as an end user.
    You use an outdated, unpatched Android version with multiple severe, publicly known exploits on an insecure device?
    Google doesn’t give a single fuck.
    You use the newest version of Android with all the patches applied on Google’s own hardware, with a locked boot loader and a hardened operating system?
    That’s not allowed by the “Play Integrity” API.
    It’s only purpose is to serve Google’s monopolistic business interests.

    • Mer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What are Revolut’s connections to Russia except its founder/owner’s nationality? /nm