• sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      … Their… monopolized… operating system?

      Which is completely source, and thus free to everyone… and also forkable, modifiable?

      … Genuienly, what are you talking about?

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      21 hours ago

      They allow you to install whatever you like on their hardware. This is the same case with the steam deck - the bootloader is accessible with a button combination.

      So if you don’t like steamOS, you can just install another OS from a USB device before the first login screen.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Er, why would you expect the software on this to be any more restricted than the Deck’s? Have you seen some information to that effect?

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        20 hours ago

        No, I just don’t trust Valve. They poached the better Cassali off Doomworld, and they’ve monopolized gaming without physical media.

        TBH, if Tim, Romero, or Carmack relaunched the Big Blue Disk, I would get in, in a heartbeat.

        • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Valve does not have a monopoly by any definition of the word, especially the legal definition. They don’t have a majority of the business because they buy out the competition or use their position to drop prices to a level that others can’t compete with. They have a majority of the market because they provide a better service than the competition and have been doing it long enough to have developed a cultural gravity in the same way that Xbox, PlayStation, and Facebook and Twitter have.