BBC is actually not state controlled; it is an independent corporation. Though I agree with your sentiment, that a state controlled news source such as RT is untrustworthy.
First ha yea “invading army” abso has nothing to do with trying to stop further NATO expansionism for the US or the fact that the US overthrew Ukraine’s legit elected gov in 2014 for a puppet gov. 2nd, western “news” outlets gets their narratives from the CIA or other US agencies
It would also be an invasion if America managed to get rid of The Idiot as a blatantly corrupt foreign-aligned fascist, and then Canada decided they’d quite like Maine.
Haha yea, because western “media” is SO much more trustworthy 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Isn’t RT a Russian state controlled news source?
Yes it is 100% controlled by the Russian government. It is not a good news source unless you want to read what Putin wants you to read.
And BBC is a british state controlled source. state-owned ≠ untrustworthy, at least not more untrustworthy than private media.
BBC is actually not state controlled; it is an independent corporation. Though I agree with your sentiment, that a state controlled news source such as RT is untrustworthy.
RT was literally founded by the government of the invading army.
First ha yea “invading army” abso has nothing to do with trying to stop further NATO expansionism for the US or the fact that the US overthrew Ukraine’s legit elected gov in 2014 for a puppet gov. 2nd, western “news” outlets gets their narratives from the CIA or other US agencies
Walk me through how Russia’s army taking territory from Ukraine isn’t invading. Explain, as you would to a child.
If Trump started bombing California, and California called for secession and asked Mexico for aid, and Mexico did so, would Mexico be invading?
Yes.
It would also be an invasion if America managed to get rid of The Idiot as a blatantly corrupt foreign-aligned fascist, and then Canada decided they’d quite like Maine.