Hm, I don’t want to sound all negative about that, “but”: maybe that’s the thing all of those transcribers in history thought about that “original” text (and before and before, etc.). I’m sure you do it with much more good intentions than transcribers working for regimes in power etc., but still it changes the message. Think about animal farm and the rules which are changed over time. That’s the problem with sticking to ancient texts which may not be well translated for the current Zeitgeist.

Delayed input, immediate output!

Wait, isn’t there an offline copy of a part of Wikipedia? The article Just by yourself a nice printer with enough ink and do it yourself ;)

It’s almost like those words mean exactly the opposite. Like with Doublespeak.