title from subheadline so still the original headline. superheadline is “Trump’s windswept hair: Untangling fake images from real photos”
title from subheadline so still the original headline. superheadline is “Trump’s windswept hair: Untangling fake images from real photos”
And that justifies anything?
Hell no it doesn’t, I was simply adding context & by doing so clarifying that the information in the comment was true.
It proves that he blames her for the pain and thus enacted revenge. He does that a lot in his life.
No, it doesn’t “prove it”, it’s only evidence that supports it. There’s a difference. Words matter.
Ok. It shows a pattern then. One of many things that add to the claims of his scumbagness
I honestly have no clue where you would’ve gotten that.